I periodically record the instructions for silly games that I came across, usually in the setting of a youth group.

This game is called “Empire”. Each player starts off as the “Ruler” of their Empire (which consists of only them at the start), and tries to add other players to their Empire by correctly guessing their secret identities. But if another person else guesses theirs, then they and their entire Empire gets subsumed into that other person’s Empire! The winner is the person who has all the other players in their Empire.

It works best with between 8 and 20 people.

To start, every player will need a pen and a small piece of paper. They chose the name of a famous person (alive or dead, real or fictional) who they will “be” for the purposes of the game, and write it on the piece of paper. All the names then go into a hat (or other suitable container).

The organiser then reads out all the names which have been submitted – e.g. “Lady Gaga”, “Harrison Ford”, “Pooh Bear”, etc., and the game begins.

The first player – say Alice – points to a person – say Bob – and asks them if they are a specific person? For example “Bob – are you Lady Gaga?”.

If Bob isn’t “Lady Gaga”, i.e. Alice guessed incorrectly, then play passes to Bob to make the next guess.

If, on the other hand, Alice guessed correctly (so Bob did write down “Lady Gaga”), then Bob moves over to sit with Alice. Alice’s “Empire” now consists of her and Bob, and she can make another guess. Bob plays no further active role in the game, except to advise Alice on her guesses, and to move with her.

If another player subsequently correctly guesses who Alice is, then both Alice and Bob move over to become part of that person’s Empire, and they can make no further guesses.

The physical movement is important, as it shows who is in which Empire, and how big they are. When you’re doing to 2 or 4 active players, people are usually having at rack their brains for which names haven’t been guessed.

The only other rules are:

• The list of names is only read out once at the start of the game – the players have to remember all the names.
• The names should be of people that all the players could reasonably be expected to have heard of and be able to remember.
• If there are duplicate names, there are 3 options:
  1. Start again, with everyone writing down the names again, but the people who had a duplicate have to choose a different name
  2. Play with the duplicates – so “Harrison Ford” has to be guessed twice.
  3. Treat the duplicates as one person, so as soon as “Harrison Ford” is correctly guessed, both “Harrison Ford”s join the guesser’s Empire
• It doesn’t have to be people – it could be films, books, meals, places. Any subject where the players are likely to choose different options from one another.
• With younger or less reliable players, they could also have to write their own name on the paper, so the host can resolve disputes.
• The host doesn’t usually play, as they have the advantage of seeing the handwriting.

This is a game of memory and psychology – especially if you play more than one round! Subsequent rounds can start with the winner of the previous round.

Turns out #chatgpt isn’t great at telling jokes…

“Give me ten examples of Dad jokes.”

1. What did the dad say when his kids asked him for money? “Money doesn’t grow on trees, you know.”
2. Why was the dad’s belt arrested? For holding up his pants!
3. Why don’t dads ever have any money? Because they always spend it on their kids!
4. How do you know when a dad is about to make a joke? When he starts to twinkle.
5. What do you call a dad who’s always on the phone? A chatterbox!
6. How does a dad make a coffee run? Very carefully.
7. What did the dad say when he heard his son was stealing? “I hope he takes after his mother.”
8. Why did the dad cross the playground? To get to the other slide!
9. How do you know when a dad is done mowing the lawn? He’s sweating profusely.
10. What did the dad say when his son asked him how to make a sandwich? “Put it together yourself, I’m not your sandwich maker.”

I think part of what is interesting about this is the way in which the jokes are wrong. There are ghosts or echoes of jokes in many of these, and they read a bit like bad translations.

So, learnt something today.

With nextjs “getInitialProps” will run server-side when the page first loads, but then run client-side on reloads (i.e. if you navigate back to it).

This means my website breaks if you go “back” to a search results page, as it tries to hit the headless WordPress back-end – which it can’t. So it errors out, and you get this lovely message:

Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information).


Solution – put the WordPress call behind an api, and then either always hit that api from “getInitialProps”, or work out whether you’re running client side or server side, as below:

FilteredPage.getInitialProps  = async(ctx) => {
  var bookmarks;

  if(global.window){
    bookmarks = await fetch(`/api/bookmarks`).then((result) => result.json());
  } else {
    bookmarks = await getBookmarks();
  }

  return {
      bookmarks
  };
}

#nextjs

I saw a post on Mastodon this morning about the futility of making resolutions for an arbitrary 365 day period.

This didn’t sit quite right with me, so I pondered it for a while and realised what my objection is. I don’t really mind the notion that resolutions are futile (back in 2011 I moved away from the idea and language of resolutions), but I don’t agree that the time period is arbitrary.

Of course, the 1^st January is semi-arbitrary – but today we return to the same relative position in the solar system that we were at 365.25 days ago, having travelled an astronomical 9×10¹¹m in the meantime. In July 2022 we were 3×10¹¹m away from where we are now.^*

Having completed our annual pilgrimage aboard the good ship Earth, I think that it’s fair enough to stop and reflect on what has happened and changed, to celebrate making such a grand journey in time and space, and to look ahead to what might be this time around.

It made me appreciate again just how governed by “the stars” our timekeeping is. Days obviously correspond to the spinning of the earth. Months broadly correspond with the orbit of the moon. Seasons are entirely due to the orbit of the earth, as is the year. In fact the only artificial constructs are time periods less than a day (hours, minutes) – at least until you get to atomic vibrations and light wavelengths – and the grouping of days into a week, which is arguably a theological construct (and there have been interesting studies on the effects that different lengths of week have on humans).

The 1^st January is only semi-arbitrary because it’s likely related to the winter solstice (and possibly the perihelion of it’s orbit), as is Christmas Day. But it also made me wonder whether Australians are more laid back than us Brits because their New Year celebration is heading into the height of summer, rather than the depth of winter? I guess in theory starting the year with days getting longer should be nicer than days getting shorter, but I do slightly shudder at the thought of the cold, dark, and wet months ahead in the UK.

Anyway, my not-resolutions are to follow. The last few years could be summarised as “make it to next year”, but it would be nice to have a slightly higher bar this time around!!

Every blessing for 2023, and I pray that God’s light would illume whatever darkness you are facing.

^*All assuming a reference point of the Sun.

Right – so if everything is working properly, this should get posted to Mastodon and Twitter, with a short excerpt shown at both.

There’s always an inherent danger with calling something “Final” – I fairly regularly see documents circulated with “UpdatedFinal” or “FinalV2”.

As always, there’s an xkcd along these lines:
xkcd.com/1294/